Canelo Alvarez's upcoming fight against Christian Mbilli has sparked debate, with former promoter Oscar De La Hoya expressing skepticism about the bout's significance. De La Hoya's criticism highlights a broader discussion on the nature of boxing events and the value of Canelo's remaining fights.
De La Hoya's skepticism stems from his belief that Canelo's peak has passed, and he is now inching closer to retirement. The 35-year-old Canelo has not fought since losing his four world titles to Terence Crawford, and the subsequent retirement of Crawford has led to Canelo's return to the ring. However, De La Hoya questions the wisdom of Canelo's choice of opponent, Mbilli, who has not fought since last September and whose credentials remain questionable.
The Golden Boy boss argues that Canelo's fans deserve better, and he prefers the idea of Canelo fighting in the US, where his fans can cheer him on. De La Hoya's criticism extends to the location of the fight, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, suggesting that the early morning time slot is not ideal for fight fans. He believes that Canelo's remaining fights should be against great fighters, not Mbilli.
This debate raises important questions about the value of boxing events and the importance of opponent selection. De La Hoya's perspective highlights the emotional and cultural significance of these fights, emphasizing the need for a more thoughtful approach to Canelo's remaining career.
In conclusion, De La Hoya's criticism of Canelo's upcoming fight against Mbilli underscores the ongoing debate about the nature of boxing events and the value of Canelo's remaining fights. It also highlights the importance of considering the fans' experience and the emotional impact of these sporting events.
